Optimist or Pessimist Chapter 30
1. In what ways has my faith become worldly?
Optimist or Pessimist Chapter 30
1. In what ways has my faith become worldly?
A bit late this week, but chapter 30 is worth at least a brief commentary before I address the questions...
Chapter 29: The Gifts of
Prophetic Insight Imperative
Today – Part II
As a part of this study we are asked, each week, to consider 5 questions. It is helpful if we can spend a day or two thinking about them prior to answering them. Some weeks questions seem to be easier than others, but they are always helpful in processing the material. Perhaps, this week, you might imagine sitting with a friend and having a discussion. Your friend completely out of the blue asks you:
1. Have you ever “heard” directly from God? What was his intent/message?
How might you answer?
Or perhaps they know you are engaging in this study and they ask about this week's experience
2. What are you hearing or otherwise learning from God through the experience of this study?
Or maybe even...
3. What do you think would God have you change about yourself to become more like he wants you to be?
It's helpful sometimes to consider how we would answer others who ask such questions rather than just asking ourselves the question.
4. What impact might these changes he seeks in you have on your work, your relationships with others, your time and efforts in your congregation, your neighborhood, your family?
And as always, after you have considered all of this, what is the bottom line in your relationship with the Lord, concerning the matter of intimacy, hearing from Him, discerning His will for you, here and now or...
5. What is God saying to me about all of this?
I hope you will take the time to consider these questions. If you've read this far, I'd love to hear your comments, constructively critical, encouraging, or otherwise. You may feel free to comment anonymously, but it'd be helpful, for context, if I knew a bit more about you.
-Soli Deo Gloria
Tozer, in this weeks reading, lifts up the idea that:
As I implied in the last post - it is a shame that preachers so often simply go through the motions, following an idealized lectionary to ensure a balanced treatment of the scriptures rather than seekng to carefully discern the particular needs of the congregation.
I have struggled with this very issue this week as I prayerfully sought a sermon topic, scripture lesson, or issues that I felt the Holy Spirit leading me to address. When all else failed I went to the lectionary passages for this Sunday and voila I was convicted. (So I'm not saying the lectionary has NO value rather that it needs to be seen as secondary.) It's a message that the world so needs to hear today, republican, democrat, socialist, communist, federalist, Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, Mormon, Agnostic, rich, poor, sick and well. It has to do with "sacrifice." Sacrifice is a word rarely used today. In our "me first", "I need", "I deserve", "I want", entitlement oriented world, we have lost the concept of sacrifice. Our success often, if not always, comes at the expense of others. We refuse to see success as necessarily being a matter of personal failure, personal sacrifice, personal emptying. Success is seen as getting rather than giving.
Jesus, the Shepherd of whom Ezekiel spoke, clarifies this judgement even further with the thought that our own actions will judge us. We who are aware of the situation and don't act, don't stand up, don't protect and defend...we who allow the goats to flourish at the expense of the sheep, or even some sheep to suffer so that other's may succeed, who scatter the sheep...
Are we ready to assume the role of becoming less so that He may become more in other's lives [John 3:30]?
The sentence that leapt off the page for me in this week’s reading was this:
“The effects of revival are being mistaken for the causes of revival.”
I recall the Willow Creek Association (now the Global Leadership Network) in its initial days. The Willow Creek Church had grown in an almost unprecedented way. Everyone in the midwest wanted to know why. Every church wanted to harness that power, that process, that means. And Willow Creek set up a “school” of sorts to teach other churches how to do what they had done. And to be sure some churches were able to harness those productive processes and grow, but not like Willow Creek. Too often, in so may similar cases, effects are mistaken for cause.
Christian Book Stores’ shelves are lined with books on “7 Steps to Renewal”, “12 Habits of Effective Preachers”, “How to Position Your Church for Revival” or similar titles. The problem is, while there certainly are elements of our lives which need to be in line with the Spirit if we are to experience revival, any specific, particular methodology is rarely successful. The Spirit blows where it will.
As Tozer rightly points out:
“The critical need
in this hour of the church’s history is not what it is so often
said to be: soul-winning, foreign missions, miracles. These are
effects, not causes. The most pressing need just now is that we who
call ourselves Christians should frankly acknowledge to each other
and to God that we are astray; that we should confess that we are
worldly, that our moral standards are low and we are spiritually
cold. We need to cease our multitude of unscriptural activities,
stop running when and where we have not been sent and cease trying to
sanctify carnal projects by professing that we are promoting them ‘in
the name of the Lord’ and ‘for the glory of God’… And this
must be done in our own lives first and then in the churches
of which we are a part.” [p. 112]
As we move into the homestretch of this study let’s keep in mind that there is no quick fix to our predicament. Our patterns of behavior are deeply ingrained. Habits are easy to form and hard to overcome. But with patient endurance and prayerful discernment, the Lord, who is always faithful, will reveal, restore, and revive us.
Tozer: The Size of the Soul Chapter 28
The Gifts of Prophetic Insight Imperative Today – Part I
1. In what ways do I see God’s ability to speak to his church limited or hampered by sin?
2. In what specific ways do I see God speaking to or otherwise addressing the current moral and spiritual needs and conditions of his church?
3. What kind of prophetic works do I see being done in the church today?
4. To what extent and in what ways is my experience helping me to speak a prophetic word to the congregation of which I am apart?
5. What is God saying to me about this?
Tozer raises a HUGELY significant matter in this week's reading. It might be paraphrased as:
He likens today's pulpiteers' sermons to mechanized expositions of scripture devoid of contemporary contextualization. I find this to be spot on as I review pastor after pastor who does nothing more than "follow the lectionary passage for this week" and then try, sometimes desperately, to force the "theme" into a fabricated potential contemporary application. Gone are the days, or so it seems when: men of God - proclaimed the Word of God - to the people of God - so as to enable them to become the righteousness of God.
If you accept the ordination of women to preaching positions, then where are your Deborah's? If you don't then where are your Isaiah's? I'm not talking about someone who is no more that a mouthpiece for the government, a nationalist, federalist, idolater (who loves laying their hands on the president and affirming his ever-so-less-than-righteous-lifestyle because it so closely matches their own profligate prosperity gospel) but one who would preach the same message to their sons and daughters, their jailers, their accusers, their employers, and those holding guns to their heads, knowing that the church of Jesus Christ is ALWAYS and forever above and beyond earthly judgement, that prophets need to tell any person in leadership to "sit down, shut up, and listen to the word of God without respect to their office. Done, of course in Christian love and appropriate deference, because God is no respecter of persons [Acts 10:34]
We need new kind of religious leader.
He must be of the old prophet type, a man who has seen visions of God and has heard a voice from the Throne. He will stand in flat contradiction to everything our smirking, smooth civilization holds dear. He will contradict, denounce, and protest in the name of God and will earn the hatred and opposition of a large segment of Christendom. Such a man is likely to be lean, rugged, blunt spoken and a little bit angry with the world. He will love Christ and the souls of men to the point of willingness to die for the glory of the One and the salvation of the other. But he will fear nothing that breathes with mortal breath.
There are leaders out there like this, but too few. They rarely appear in pulpit finery, and even more rarely in denominational settings. These are the ones that refuse to compromise the gospel for income, refuse to soften the Word of God for popularity, who refuse the counsel of the "friends of Job" that so often make up denominational commitees and boards. These are the ones to whom we need to look and to listen.
“For the word of God is alive and active.
Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing
soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes
of the heart.” [Hebrews 4:12]
Not Papal Infallibility But the Witness Chapter 27
1. In what ways do I see common knowledge evident in both Christians and non-Christians where I am?
I see references to explanations of earthquakes, causes of distress and war, understanding of mathematics and general scientific principles, teachings on environmentalism and all sort of attempts to explain the political situation in the USA (with presupposed understanding that lacks spiritual insight)...
I'm often surprised at who stops by this blog - 5 October - 4 November:
Tozer gets rather deep in this week's chapter. It is difficult to get through without a broader reading of Tozer's materials in books such as The Knowledge of the Holy, The Pursuit of God, and God's Pursuit of Man to name but a few. He mentions "three degrees of knowledge open to Christians."
1. "The first is the common knowledge shared with all persons, namely the data furnished by the senses and by reason operating upon such data."
2. "The second is the knowledge received by faith. It consists of all data given by divine revelation and received by the believing mind without proof.
3. "The third kind of knowledge is that given by direct spiritual experience...It has nothing to do with the senses and so it is not physical or natural data It has nothing to do with ethics or doctrine so it is not moral or theological knowledge."
Now before we get too far into the weeds some background on this type of discussion is in order. Traditionally, Reformed Christian theology has put forth two types of Revelation (that is means by which God reveals Himself who is Truth)
1. The first is General Revelation - information about God which is discerned through nature and reason -
The heavens declare the glory of God,
and the sky above proclaims his handiwork.
Day to day pours out speech,
and night to night reveals knowledge. [ Psalm 19:1-2]
Today, we had a wonderful visit with former missionary colleagues, Ron and Denise Hamme, from Thailand whom we hadn't seen since 2006!...